Maestro made mobile flows simple. agent-qa makes them learn.
Maestro popularized YAML-declared mobile UI flows with static commands. agent-qa keeps the YAML ergonomics but replaces static commands with AI-executed intent — plus web support and memory.
Try agent-qa, the open-source QA agent where mobile flows compound into memory.
agent-qa vs Maestro
| Capability | agent-qa | Maestro | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAML-based authoring | Both use YAML. Maestro's YAML lists UI commands (tapOn, assertVisible); agent-qa's YAML states user intent in plain English that the runtime plans against the live app. | ||
| Survives UI changes | Maestro's text/ID matching tolerates small shifts but static commands still break on real redesigns. agent-qa re-plans the whole step from intent. | ||
| Execution memory | agent-qa records behavioral observations across runs; Maestro flows execute the same commands cold each time. | ||
| Open source | Both have open-source cores; Maestro pairs with a paid cloud for scaled execution. agent-qa's full workflow stays repo-local. | ||
| Web testing in the same harness | Maestro is mobile-first with some web support. agent-qa treats web and mobile as equal targets under one contract. | ||
| Coding-agent native | agent-qa ships MCP tools, Skills, and structured evidence for autonomous agents; Maestro is operated by humans and CI scripts. | ||
| Bring your own LLM | agent-qa's planning runs on the model provider you configure. Maestro's core doesn't use LLM planning. | ||
| Local and CI execution | Both run locally and in CI without mandatory cloud services. |
Why Maestro users graduate to agent-qa
Intent beats commands
Maestro's tapOn and assertVisible commands are simpler than code, but they still encode a fixed UI. agent-qa's steps say what the user is doing — 'add the item to the cart and check out' — and the runtime works out the taps on whatever the screen looks like today.
The same YAML instinct, more leverage
If your team already thinks in Maestro YAML, agent-qa feels native on day one — the file just says more with less, covers web too, and every run feeds memory and cache instead of evaporating.
No cloud dependency for scale
Maestro's scaled execution story leads to its paid cloud. agent-qa's runs, artifacts, memory, and dashboard are local and CI-native — scale is your infrastructure decision, not a subscription tier.
Maestro proved YAML flows are the right ergonomics for mobile testing. agent-qa keeps the ergonomics and upgrades the engine: intent instead of commands, memory instead of amnesia, and web included.
Frequently asked questions
Is agent-qa a good Maestro alternative?
Yes — it's the natural next step. You keep YAML-declared flows and gain AI execution that survives redesigns, memory that compounds across runs, first-class web support, and MCP/Skills integration for coding agents.
What does agent-qa cost compared to Maestro?
Both cores are free and open source; Maestro monetizes scaled cloud execution while agent-qa has no paid tier at all. agent-qa's operating cost is LLM tokens on your chosen provider, moderated by caching.
How do I migrate Maestro flows to agent-qa?
It's the friendliest migration on this site: your Maestro YAML already names each flow's steps, so rewriting command sequences as plain-English intent is nearly mechanical — and the result is shorter than what it replaces.
Does agent-qa support Android and iOS like Maestro?
Yes — native flows on both platforms, plus web, all under the same YAML contract, memory store, and CLI.
Why does memory matter for mobile testing?
Mobile apps change UI constantly and devices add timing variance. agent-qa's memory records how your app actually behaves — screens, quirks, flows — so subsequent runs plan faster and flake less, which static command flows can never do.
Write tests in natural language
Define actions and assertions in human language while agents work from visible roles, labels, and screen state.
Learn about natural language tests
test-id: t_slice-cart-bane-deep-fold-prim-paar-baru-nable-kayname: Check Linear issue creation flowtarget: linear-webuse: browser: name: chromiumsteps: - Click on the Create issue icon. - | Verify that the Create issue modal is shown. - | Enter "Fix mobile login" in the "Issue title" input field. - | Select "Engineering" from the Team selector and select "Todo" from the Status field. - Click on the Create issue button. - | Verify that the created issue is shown with title "Fix mobile login" and status "Todo".
Evolves with every run
With every test run, agent-qa builds execution memory from product, suite, and test observations, then adds that context to future runs. agent-qa also curates memory from steps that were healed during execution, helping future runs avoid the same mistake.
Learn about memory
Built for Humans
Top-tier developer experience with a beautiful dashboard, intuitive CLI, and clear workflows for authoring, running, and debugging tests.
Learn about the dashboard
Runs
❯ agent-qa run tests/linear/create-issue.yamlRunning 1 test(s)...✓ Click on the Create issue icon. 5s Sub-actions: 1 total (1 succeeded, 0 failed)✓ Verify that the Create issue modal is shown. 4s Sub-actions: 1 total (1 succeeded, 0 failed)✓ Enter "Fix mobile login" in the "Issue title" input field. 5s Sub-actions: 1 total (1 succeeded, 0 failed)✓ Select Engineering from Team and Todo from Status 6s Sub-actions: 2 total (2 succeeded, 0 failed)✓ Click on the Create issue button. 3s Sub-actions: 1 total (1 succeeded, 0 failed)✓ Verify created issue title and Todo status 6s Sub-actions: 2 total (2 succeeded, 0 failed) PASS Check Linear issue creation flow 29sRun ID: r_lined-frig-schema-main-depart-hing-aline-balls-cran-dess Memory: 1 added (3s)Run attributes: agent-qa.trigger=cli agent-qa.runner=localTests: 1 of 1 passedSteps: 6 passed, 6 totalCache: 6 hits, 0 missesTime: 29s
Built for Machines
The same primitives are exposed through MCP and skills so coding agents can discover schemas, author YAML, enqueue runs, inspect artifacts, and triage failures.
Learn about MCP
Accelerate runs with smart Cache
The action cache reuses validated plans across similar subsequent test runs, reducing planner work, token usage, and runtime overhead.
Learn about caching
Execution Speed
42s -> 8s
Cached action plans skip redundant planner work on similar subsequent runs.
Reduced Token Usage
fewer planner tokens
Validated steps reuse prior reasoning when the flow and screen state still match.
Run sandboxed hooks during tests
Run Node, Bun, Python, or Bash hooks in isolated Docker containers to set up environments, call APIs, seed fixtures, tear down state, or pass structured outputs back into the active test run.
Learn about hooks
// emits CHECKOUT_EUR_TOTAL_CENTS for the active test runconst response = await fetch("https://api.frankfurter.app/latest?from=USD&to=EUR,GBP")const { rates } = await response.json() const fixture = { plan: "team", currency: "USD", subtotal_cents: 2900, eur_total_cents: Math.round(2900 * rates.EUR), gbp_total_cents: Math.round(2900 * rates.GBP), seat_limit: 12, fixture_at: "2026-05-07T00:00:00Z",} const env = Object.entries(fixture) .map(([key, value]) => `CHECKOUT_${key.toUpperCase()}=${value}`) .join("\n") await Bun.write("/tmp/agent-qa.env", `${env}\n`)console.log(JSON.stringify({ checkoutFixture: fixture }, null, 2))
Review your QA like code
Tests, configs, hooks, memory, and suite logic all live as version-controlled code, so every change can be diffed, reviewed, reused, and shared across teams.
Learn about configuration
Self-healing test execution
When any sub-action, such as click, fill, or select, fails, agent-qa re-observes the UI and tries a different path in the same run. Tests recover from UI drift and flaky interactions instead of failing on the first broken action.
Learn about self-healing
Bring your own LLM
Run tests with the model of your choice via OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints, Gemini, local or open-source models, and subscriptions like Codex and Claude Code.
Learn about LLM providers

More comparisons
* This comparison is based on publicly available information. Product capabilities and pricing can change; verify details with each vendor before making a purchase decision.